You can be sure that all of your personal information, such as your name, e-mail and phone number, is safe with us. But you are also responsible for your privacy – make sure you don’t disclose this data to your writer, and contact our support team members in case you have been asked to provide such information. Otherwise, your data is going to be safe. As for the safety of the transactions, they are processed by PayPal – we believe there’s no need for more comments here.
Since the 1980s, the revisionist narrative continues, experts have determined that powder and crack show more pharmacological “similarities than differences,” in the Times ’s words, and that crack is no more damaging to fetuses than alcohol. The belief that crack was an inner-city scourge was thus a racist illusion, and the sentencing structure to quell it a racist assault. Or, as . District Judge Clyde Cahill put it, in what one hopes is not a representative sample of the federal judicial temperament: “Legislators’ unconscious racial aversion towards blacks, sparked by unsubstantiated reports of the effects of crack, reactionary media prodding, and an agitated constituency, motivated the legislators . . to produce a dual system of punishment.”